Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

DeepSeek V4 Flash leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.4. DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.059. DeepSeek V4 Flash is faster at 36.78s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 FlashIt has the best score here (5.6), while responding about 1.6x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.6 5.4
Rank #156 #164
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 8.5 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 25.8%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 1.451
Total Cost $0.044 $0.059
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 240,221 86,641
Output Tokens 100,727 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 36.78s 58.43s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 809.09s 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair