Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.059. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIts score stays close to the best score here (5.3 vs 5.4), while costing about 3.8x less than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.3 5.4
Rank #170 #164
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 10.0 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 1.451
Total Cost $0.016 $0.059
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 86,641
Output Tokens 11,555 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 58.43s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#170 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair