Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.041. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 10.09s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIts score stays close to the best score here (5.3 vs 5.4), while costing about 2.7x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14
Score 5.3 5.4
Rank #155 #151
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 7.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 0 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 0.585
Total Cost $0.016 $0.041
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 61,085
Output Tokens 11,555 5,905
Reasoning Tokens 0 46,990
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 10.09s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 86.23s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 222.03s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#155 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#151 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair