Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.025. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 8.58s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 1.6x less than MiMo-V2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.3 5.1
Rank #170 #176
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 0.770
Total Cost $0.016 $0.025
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 141,043
Output Tokens 11,555 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#170 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#176 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair