Navigate
Advertise here

Laguna S 2.1 (high) vs MiMo-V2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 4.9 vs 4.9. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.063 vs $0.147. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 9.88s vs 113.63s, with pass rates of 27.5% vs 26.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#305
Total Output Tokens
630,543
Response Time (avg)
113.63s
Total Cost
$0.147
Rank
#308
Total Output Tokens
33,960
Response Time (avg)
9.88s
Total Cost
$0.063
Recommended model MiMo-V2.5

It has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 2.4x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 4.9 4.9
Rank #305 #308
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.5% 26.1%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 3.664 1.246
Total Cost $0.147 $0.063
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.180 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 344,806 276,608
Output Tokens 177,330 33,960
Reasoning Tokens 453,213 0
Response Time (avg) 113.63s 9.88s
Response Time (max) 1190.11s 124.23s
Response Time (total) 2613.48s 227.24s
Parameters 118B total (8B active) 310B total (15B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#305 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

#308 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair