Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.1. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.041. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 10.09s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.4 5.1
Rank #154 #164
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 25.8%
Flaky tests 7 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.585 0.770
Total Cost $0.041 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 61,085 141,043
Output Tokens 5,905 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 46,990 0
Response Time (avg) 10.09s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 86.23s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 222.03s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#164 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair