Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Laguna S 2.1 (high) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.1. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.127. Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 9.12s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder NextIts score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.4), while costing about 5.2x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.4 5.1
Rank #167 #174
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 25.8%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.153 0.488
Total Cost $0.127 $0.025
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 208,931 134,218
Output Tokens 175,588 11,808
Reasoning Tokens 409,276 0
Response Time (avg) 111.61s 9.12s
Response Time (max) 1190.11s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 2455.39s 145.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

#174 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair