Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Laguna S 2.1 (high) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.1. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.021 vs $0.127. Qwen3.5-9B is faster at 19.17s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 19.7%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-9BIts score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.4), while costing about 6.3x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.4 5.1
Rank #167 #177
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 19.7%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.153 0.490
Total Cost $0.127 $0.021
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 208,931 144,407
Output Tokens 175,588 37,484
Reasoning Tokens 409,276 0
Response Time (avg) 111.61s 19.17s
Response Time (max) 1190.11s 382.06s
Response Time (total) 2455.39s 421.74s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

#177 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair