Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.1. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.021 vs $0.041. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) is faster at 10.09s vs 19.17s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 19.7%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low)It has the best score here (5.4), while responding about 1.9x faster than Qwen3.5-9B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.4 5.1
Rank #165 #177
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 19.7%
Flaky tests 7 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.585 0.490
Total Cost $0.041 $0.021
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 61,085 144,407
Output Tokens 5,905 37,484
Reasoning Tokens 46,990 0
Response Time (avg) 10.09s 19.17s
Response Time (max) 86.23s 382.06s
Response Time (total) 222.03s 421.74s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#177 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair