Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B leads on average score with 5.1 vs 5.0. GPT-4o-mini has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.021. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 1.99s vs 19.17s, with pass rates of 22.7% vs 19.7%.

Recommended modelGPT-4o-miniIts score stays close to the best score here (5.0 vs 5.1), while costing about 2.1x less than Qwen3.5-9B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.0 5.1
Rank #189 #183
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.9 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 22.7% 19.7%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.195 0.490
Total Cost $0.010 $0.021
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 53,136 144,407
Output Tokens 2,911 37,484
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.99s 19.17s
Response Time (max) 7.58s 382.06s
Response Time (total) 29.86s 421.74s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#189 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

#183 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair