Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MiniMax M2.7 (medium) vs GPT-4o-mini

MiniMax M2.7 (medium) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 5.0. GPT-4o-mini has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.208. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 1.92s vs 43.25s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 22.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#240
Total Output Tokens
147,704
Response Time (avg)
43.25s
Total Cost
$0.208
Rank
#243
Total Output Tokens
2,913
Response Time (avg)
1.92s
Total Cost
$0.010
Recommended model GPT-4o-mini

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.0 vs 5.0), while costing about 21.3x less than MiniMax M2.7 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18 GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18
Score 5.0 5.0
Rank #240 #243
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.6 9.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 22.7%
Flaky tests 9 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.149 0.195
Total Cost $0.208 $0.010
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,527 53,145
Output Tokens 18,558 2,913
Reasoning Tokens 129,146 0
Response Time (avg) 43.25s 1.92s
Response Time (max) 196.21s 7.58s
Response Time (total) 908.21s 30.71s
Parameters 230B total (10B active) ~8B
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#240 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

#243 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair