- Score
- 9.4 (+4.39 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 44.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 87.6% faster
Minimax
Release: 2026-03-18
Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:19
minimax/minimax-m2.7::medium
230B total (10B active)MoEWeights available Summary
MiniMax M2.7 scores 5.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #360. It has 10.0 reliability, a 44.9% pass rate, $0.326 total cost, and 50.32s average response time.
What makes MiniMax M2.7 unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while General Intelligence is its weakest area at #15.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+3.60 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 81.4% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 85.1% faster
- Score
- 7.5 (+2.57 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 41.6% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 230B total (10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- MiniMax modified MIT
5.0
Consistency
6.4
10.0
Total Output Tokens
170,899
Total Input Tokens
277,130
Input Price
$0.210 / 1M
Output Price
$0.840 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.042 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
10
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#360 MiniMax M2.7
medium- Cost
- $0.022
- Time
- 22.8s
- Tokens
- 9,250 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:19 Re-test | 5.0 | 10.0 | $0.326 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 21:18 New test added | 5.0 | 10.0 | $0.196 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:26 New test added | 5.3 | 7.8 | $0.124 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:52 Suite changed | 5.0 | 8.3 | $0.104 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 5.3 | N/A | $0.091 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.279 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-10 13:42 | $0.270 / 1M | $1.080 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-12 18:42 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-06-29 01:00 | $0.180 / 1M | $0.720 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-07-09 20:59 | $0.240 / 1M | $0.960 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.300 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.210 / 1M | $0.840 / 1M | $0.042 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
MiniMax M2.7mediumvsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowMiniMax M2.7mediumvsDots 3 Note PreviewdefaultFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsGPT-4o-minidefaultMiniMax M2.7mediumvsApodex 1.1 MinidefaultFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeMiniMax M2.7mediumvsInkling SmallnoneFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumMiniMax M2.7mediumvsQwen3 Coder Nextdefault
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 4.7 | 3.1 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.9 | 6.3 | |
| Coding | 5.7 | 9.1 | |
| Combined | 3.8 | 1.6 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 3.9 | 2.5 | |
| Instructions following | 3.8 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.9 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |