Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-4o-mini vs Laguna S 2.1 (medium)

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 5.0. GPT-4o-mini has the lower benchmark cost at $0.024 vs $0.080. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 4.16s vs 63.06s, with pass rates of 21.7% vs 24.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#300
Total Output Tokens
3,627
Response Time (avg)
4.16s
Total Cost
$0.024
Rank
#296
Total Output Tokens
386,824
Response Time (avg)
63.06s
Total Cost
$0.080
Recommended model GPT-4o-mini

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.0 vs 5.0), while costing about 3.3x less than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.0 5.0
Rank #300 #296
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.9 8.5
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.7% 24.6%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.480 1.987
Total Cost $0.024 $0.080
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.180 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,180 230,291
Output Tokens 3,627 99,030
Reasoning Tokens 0 287,794
Response Time (avg) 4.16s 63.06s
Response Time (max) 39.99s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 70.70s 1450.31s
Parameters ~8B 118B total (8B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#300 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

#296 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair