Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (high) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.127. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIts score stays close to the best score here (5.3 vs 5.4), while costing about 8.3x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.3 5.4
Rank #170 #167
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 27.3%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 3.153
Total Cost $0.016 $0.127
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 208,931
Output Tokens 11,555 175,588
Reasoning Tokens 0 409,276
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 111.61s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 1190.11s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 2455.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#170 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair