Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling-2.6-1T vs Inkling Small

The average score is effectively tied at 5.3 vs 5.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.058. Inkling Small is faster at 1.51s vs 8.58s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 24.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#190
Total Output Tokens
11,555
Response Time (avg)
8.58s
Total Cost
$0.016
Rank
#187
Total Output Tokens
8,770
Response Time (avg)
1.51s
Total Cost
$0.058
Recommended model Inkling Small

It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 5.7x faster than Ling-2.6-1T.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Inkling Small Inkling Small none Release: 2026-08-01
Score 5.3 5.3
Rank #190 #187
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 24.2%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 1.158
Total Cost $0.016 $0.058
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 94,724
Output Tokens 11,555 8,770
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 1.51s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 12.35s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 33.27s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#190 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#187 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
42.1s
Tokens
6,319 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Inkling Small 3.6 10.0 0.0% 0 759ms 7,356 454 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair