- Rank
- #315
- Total Output Tokens
- 11,555
- Response Time (avg)
- 8.16s
- Total Cost
- $0.016
Ling 2.6 1t vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Ling 2.6 1t leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling 2.6 1t has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.027. Ling 2.6 1t is faster at 8.16s vs 13.04s, with pass rates of 17.4% vs 29.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #321
- Total Output Tokens
- 27,395
- Response Time (avg)
- 13.04s
- Total Cost
- $0.027
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 1t
It has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 1.7x less than GLM 4.7 Flash.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 2.6 1t Ling 2.6 1t none | GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Rank | #315 | #321 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 17.4% | 29.0% |
| Flaky tests | 0 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.278 | 0.528 |
| Total Cost | $0.016 | $0.027 |
| Input Price | $0.075 / 1M | $0.061 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.625 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 106,423 | 255,363 |
| Output Tokens | 11,555 | 27,395 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 8.16s | 13.04s |
| Response Time (max) | 25.72s | 97.15s |
| Response Time (total) | 163.24s | 221.61s |
| Parameters | 1T total (63B active) | 30B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#315 Ling 2.6 1t
none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#321 GLM 4.7 Flash
none
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 38ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 80.73s | 153,850 | 4,403 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.4 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.55s | 726 | 777 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 5.2 | 7.9 | 41.7% | 1 | 5.51s | 555 | 438 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.8 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 10.57s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 4.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.54s | 7,256 | 650 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 23.79s | 80,539 | 9,304 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 50.18s | 77,084 | 21,175 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.37s | 8,313 | 285 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 4.82s | 7,107 | 196 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.08s | 819 | 27 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 2.22s | 696 | 19 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 20.34s | 540 | 140 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.59s | 477 | 134 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 6.4 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 5.36s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 888ms | 636 | 62 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.36s | 729 | 131 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.4 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.20s | 609 | 97 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 25.72s | 13,212 | 429 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 7.05s | 6,907 | 212 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 692ms | 186 | 9 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 2.6 1tnonevsLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneLing 2.6 1tnonevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneLing 2.6 1tnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsLing 2.6 1tnoneLing 2.6 1tnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneLing 2.6 1tnonevsLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailableMiniMax M2.7mediumvsGLM 4.7 Flashnone