Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7

Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.0. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.163. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 41.28s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 10.7x less than MiniMax M2.7 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18
Score 5.3 5.0
Rank #158 #168
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 6.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 0 9
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 3.906
Total Cost $0.016 $0.163
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 114,518
Output Tokens 11,555 18,558
Reasoning Tokens 0 119,036
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 41.28s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 196.21s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 866.81s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#158 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#168 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair