Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Laguna S 2.1 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.4. GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower benchmark cost at $0.029 vs $0.053. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 58.42s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 24.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-04

Rank
#241
Total Output Tokens
6,709
Response Time (avg)
1.50s
Total Cost
$0.029
Rank
#239
Total Output Tokens
339,595
Response Time (avg)
58.42s
Total Cost
$0.053
Recommended model GPT-5.6 Luna

It has the best score here (5.4), while costing about 1.8x less than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.4 5.4
Rank #241 #239
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.8
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 24.2%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.357 1.451
Total Cost $0.029 $0.053
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.180 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,332 86,647
Output Tokens 6,709 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 1.50s 58.42s
Response Time (max) 10.57s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 33.05s 1285.26s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) 118B total (8B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#241 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

#239 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair