Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.142. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 LunaIt has the best score here (5.4), while responding about 39.1x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.4 5.4
Rank #166 #164
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 8.8 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 25.8%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.360 1.451
Total Cost $0.142 $0.059
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,323 86,641
Output Tokens 6,709 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 1.50s 58.43s
Response Time (max) 10.57s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 32.91s 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#166 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair