Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.053 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.62s vs 58.42s, with pass rates of 24.2% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-04

Rank
#239
Total Output Tokens
339,595
Response Time (avg)
58.42s
Total Cost
$0.053
Rank
#234
Total Output Tokens
16,156
Response Time (avg)
10.62s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 27B

It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 5.5x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.5
Rank #239 #234
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 7.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 24.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 1.220
Total Cost $0.053 $0.062
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.180 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,647 95,805
Output Tokens 97,298 16,156
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.42s 10.62s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 1285.26s 233.68s
Parameters 118B total (8B active) 27B
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#239 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#234 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair