Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.087. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 27BIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 5.5x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.5
Rank #164 #158
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.4 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 45.5%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 1.220
Total Cost $0.059 $0.087
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 95,796
Output Tokens 97,298 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#158 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair