Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

DeepSeek V4 Flash leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.4. DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.127. DeepSeek V4 Flash is faster at 36.78s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 FlashIt has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 2.9x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.6 5.4
Rank #156 #167
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.5 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 3.153
Total Cost $0.044 $0.127
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 240,221 208,931
Output Tokens 100,727 175,588
Reasoning Tokens 0 409,276
Response Time (avg) 36.78s 111.61s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 1190.11s
Response Time (total) 809.09s 2455.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair