Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.3. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.127. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 35B A3BIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.1x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.3
Rank #167 #169
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.1 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.153 1.496
Total Cost $0.127 $0.061
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 208,931 93,979
Output Tokens 175,588 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 409,276 0
Response Time (avg) 111.61s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 1190.11s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 2455.39s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

#169 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair