Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Laguna S 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.3. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.061. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 35B A3BIts score stays close to the best score here (5.3 vs 5.4), while responding about 10.6x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.3
Rank #164 #169
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.4 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 31.8%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 1.496
Total Cost $0.059 $0.061
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 93,979
Output Tokens 97,298 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#169 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair