Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 5.6. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.045 vs $0.057. GLM 5.1 is faster at 4.10s vs 8.28s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 41.3%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 6.2 5.6
Rank #115 #141
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 41.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.562 0.843
Total Cost $0.045 $0.057
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,750 47,133
Output Tokens 7,759 3,754
Reasoning Tokens 56,357 0
Response Time (avg) 8.28s 4.10s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 32.57s
Response Time (total) 173.80s 86.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#141 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair