Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 5.3. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $0.045. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is faster at 3.41s vs 8.28s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 5.3
Rank #116 #153
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 31.8%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.562 0.393
Total Cost $0.045 $0.020
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,750 47,735
Output Tokens 7,759 3,383
Reasoning Tokens 56,357 0
Response Time (avg) 8.28s 3.41s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 46.00s
Response Time (total) 173.80s 71.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#116 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#153 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair