Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Inkling Small (low)

Inkling Small (low) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.7. Inkling Small (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.247. Inkling Small (low) is faster at 2.08s vs 12.92s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#166
Total Output Tokens
88,458
Response Time (avg)
12.92s
Total Cost
$0.247
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
14,653
Response Time (avg)
2.08s
Total Cost
$0.059
Recommended model Inkling Small (low)

It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 4.2x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24 Inkling Small Inkling Small low Release: 2026-08-01
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #166 #164
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 50.0%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.182 0.648
Total Cost $0.247 $0.059
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $2.080 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 241,566 81,438
Output Tokens 88,458 2,715
Reasoning Tokens 0 11,938
Response Time (avg) 12.92s 2.08s
Response Time (max) 212.63s 5.82s
Response Time (total) 284.21s 45.87s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#166 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

#164 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
5.9s
Tokens
759 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0
Inkling Small 4.6 5.0 33.3% 2 3.70s 7,374 375 4,332

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair