Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.059. Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 7.64s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 26B A4BIt has the best score here (5.5), while costing about 4.0x less than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.5 5.4
Rank #162 #164
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.2 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 25.8%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.235 1.451
Total Cost $0.015 $0.059
Input Price $0.070 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,282 86,641
Output Tokens 15,781 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 7.64s 58.43s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 167.98s 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair