Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.127. Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 7.64s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 26B A4BIt has the best score here (5.5), while costing about 8.7x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.5 5.4
Rank #162 #167
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.2 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 27.3%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.235 3.153
Total Cost $0.015 $0.127
Input Price $0.070 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,282 208,931
Output Tokens 15,781 175,588
Reasoning Tokens 0 409,276
Response Time (avg) 7.64s 111.61s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 1190.11s
Response Time (total) 167.98s 2455.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair