Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Laguna S 2.1 (high) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.2. Laguna S 2.1 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.127 vs $0.147. Inkling is faster at 3.50s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 28.8%.

Recommended modelInklingIts score stays close to the best score here (5.2 vs 5.4), while responding about 31.9x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Inkling Inkling none Release: 2026-07-18
Score 5.4 5.2
Rank #167 #172
Reliability 9.9 9.9
Consistency 8.1 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 28.8%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.153 2.448
Total Cost $0.127 $0.147
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 208,931 104,111
Output Tokens 175,588 10,551
Reasoning Tokens 409,276 0
Response Time (avg) 111.61s 3.50s
Response Time (max) 1190.11s 48.02s
Response Time (total) 2455.39s 77.09s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

#172 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
5.3s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair