Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.087 vs $0.127. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 27BIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 10.5x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.5
Rank #167 #158
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.1 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 45.5%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.153 1.220
Total Cost $0.127 $0.087
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 208,931 95,796
Output Tokens 175,588 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 409,276 0
Response Time (avg) 111.61s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 1190.11s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 2455.39s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

#158 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair