Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.5. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.077 vs $0.087. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 27BIt offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.5), faster response than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high), and balanced cost.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #137 #145
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.7 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 45.5%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.097 1.220
Total Cost $0.077 $0.087
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 50,470 95,796
Output Tokens 3,957 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 111,374 0
Response Time (avg) 15.90s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 118.35s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 349.71s 234.39s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#145 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair