Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 6.0 vs 5.5. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.030. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 3.72s vs 6.47s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 47.6%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.0 5.5
Rank #124 #145
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.6 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 47.6%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.427 0.467
Total Cost $0.030 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,464 52,721
Output Tokens 4,227 3,812
Reasoning Tokens 34,864 0
Response Time (avg) 6.47s 3.72s
Response Time (max) 25.49s 11.82s
Response Time (total) 135.80s 78.08s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#145 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair