Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Summary

Ling-2.6-1T vs Qwen3.5-9B benchmark comparison: Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 4.3 vs 4.2. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.035. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 7.72s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 14.3% vs 27.0%.

Recommended model: Ling-2.6-1T - It has the best score here (4.3), while costing about 8.4x less than Qwen3.5-9B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.3 4.2
Rank #159 #161
Reliability N/A 6.7
Consistency 10.0 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 14.3% 27.0%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 1.187
Total Cost $0.005 $0.035
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.040 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,905 17,070
Output Tokens 2,434 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 0 209,516
Response Time (avg) 7.72s 82.24s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 139.00s 1315.88s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#159 Ling-2.6-1T

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#161 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.4 10.0 0.0% 0 6.55s 726 777 0
Qwen3.5-9B 5.1 5.8 50.0% 2 34.44s 369 2,621 12,411
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 23.53s 9,030 183 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.37s 8,313 285 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.6 5.6 33.3% 1 87.31s 4,722 1,383 32,113
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.04s 810 27 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 137.75s 295 11,549 48,475
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 20.34s 540 140 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 226.38s 180 0 30,695
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 6.4 10.0 50.0% 0 5.36s 732 81 0
Qwen3.5-9B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 5.75s 381 491 1,824
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 5.36s 729 131 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 32.27s 376 1,593 12,026
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 25.72s 13,212 429 0
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.31s 8,283 444 1,149
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 177.02s 68 3,074 29,694

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair