Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 5.3 vs 3.8. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.036. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.4x less than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.3 3.8
Rank #176 #220
Reliability 10.0 5.0
Consistency 10.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 25.8%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 1.187
Total Cost $0.016 $0.036
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 17,070
Output Tokens 11,555 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 0 209,516
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 82.24s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 1315.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#176 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#220 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair