Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Mistral: Mistral Small 4

Ling-2.6-1T leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.096. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 8.58s vs 10.77s, with pass rates of 18.2% vs 42.4%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-1TIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 6.3x less than Mistral Small 4 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 medium Release: 2026-03-16
Score 5.3 5.1
Rank #155 #159
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 18.2% 42.4%
Flaky tests 0 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.277 1.913
Total Cost $0.016 $0.096
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,414 140,494
Output Tokens 11,555 39,462
Reasoning Tokens 0 92,362
Response Time (avg) 8.58s 10.77s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 59.15s
Response Time (total) 163.06s 236.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#155 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#159 Mistral Small 4

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
47.9s
Tokens
9,857 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
Mistral Small 4 4.4 5.1 33.3% 2 39.98s 7,636 11,635 54,715

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair