Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-9B (medium) vs Grok 4.20

Grok 4.20 leads on average score with 4.1 vs 3.8. Grok 4.20 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.057 vs $0.062. Grok 4.20 is faster at 1.11s vs 107.51s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 27.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#316
Total Output Tokens
413,442
Response Time (avg)
107.51s
Total Cost
$0.062
Rank
#304
Total Output Tokens
1,923
Response Time (avg)
1.11s
Total Cost
$0.057
Recommended model Grok 4.20

It has the best score here (4.1), while responding about 97.0x faster than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02 Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 none Release: 2026-03-31
Score 3.8 4.1
Rank #316 #304
Reliability 6.0 N/A
Consistency 8.1 8.1
Attempts 66/66 54/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 5 0
Total Runs 66 54
Cost per result 2.061 1.570
Total Cost $0.062 $0.057
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 17,195 41,313
Output Tokens 46,735 1,923
Reasoning Tokens 366,707 0
Response Time (avg) 107.51s 1.11s
Response Time (max) 569.97s 6.04s
Response Time (total) 1720.15s 19.96s
Parameters 9B ~1T total (~100B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#316 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

#304 xAI: Grok 4.20

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
6.5s
Tokens
1,367 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129
Grok 4.20 1.1 3.1 0.0% 0 1.22s 1,074 312 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair