Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Mercury 2 leads on average score with 4.6 vs 3.8. Mercury 2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.030 vs $0.036. Mercury 2 is faster at 829ms vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 22.7% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelMercury 2It has the best score here (4.6), while responding about 99.2x faster than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.6 3.8
Rank #204 #220
Reliability 10.0 5.0
Consistency 9.2 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 22.7% 25.8%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.734 1.187
Total Cost $0.030 $0.036
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 88,704 17,070
Output Tokens 9,564 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 0 209,516
Response Time (avg) 829ms 82.24s
Response Time (max) 4.52s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 18.24s 1315.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#204 Mercury 2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
1.8s
Tokens
1,514 tok

#220 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 3.4 9.6 0.0% 0 1.03s 7,229 3,088 0
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair