#184 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Cobuddy vs Inception: Mercury 2
Cobuddy (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.6. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.030. Mercury 2 is faster at 829ms vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 22.7%.
Recommended modelMercury 2Its score stays close to the best score here (4.6 vs 4.7), while responding about 48.1x faster than Cobuddy (medium).
Last updated at: 2026-07-18
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Rank | #184 | #185 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 45.5% | 22.7% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.734 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.030 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.750 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 88,704 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 9,564 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 39.90s | 829ms |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 4.52s |
| Response Time (total) | 797.98s | 18.24s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#185 Mercury 2
none- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 1.8s
- Tokens
- 1,514 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mercury 2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneCobuddymediumvsLing-2.6-flashnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsGPT-4o-mininoneCobuddymediumvsDeepSeek V3.2noneMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium