- Rank
- #280
- Total Output Tokens
- 118,380
- Response Time (avg)
- 39.90s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Cobuddy (medium) vs Mercury 2
The average score is effectively tied at 4.7 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.030. Mercury 2 is faster at 825ms vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 24.2%.
- Rank
- #281
- Total Output Tokens
- 9,584
- Response Time (avg)
- 825ms
- Total Cost
- $0.030
Recommended model
Mercury 2
It has the best score here (4.7), while responding about 48.4x faster than Cobuddy (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Rank | #280 | #281 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Attempts | 63/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 45.5% | 24.2% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.740 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.030 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.750 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 89,637 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 9,584 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 39.90s | 825ms |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 4.52s |
| Response Time (total) | 797.98s | 18.14s |
| Parameters | ~21B total (~3B active) | ~100B |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#280 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#281 Mercury 2
none- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 1.8s
- Tokens
- 1,514 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Granite 4.2 8BhighvsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumvsGranite 4.2 8BhighTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneMercury 2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree Available