Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Cobuddy

Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.008. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIt has the best score here (4.8), while responding about 13.4x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06
Score 4.8 4.7
Rank #179 #184
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.017 0.000
Total Cost $0.008 $0.000
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 37,449
Output Tokens 2,169 1,677
Reasoning Tokens 0 116,703
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 39.90s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 309.02s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 797.98s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#184 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair