Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy (medium) vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super leads on average score with 4.5 vs 4.4. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.016. Nemotron 3 Super is faster at 7.11s vs 38.01s, with pass rates of 43.5% vs 27.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-16

Compared models

Rank
#376
Total Output Tokens
118,380
Response Time (avg)
38.01s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#372
Total Output Tokens
9,074
Response Time (avg)
7.11s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model Nemotron 3 Super

It has the best score here (4.5), while responding about 5.3x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Free Available Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super none Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available
Score 4.4 4.5
Rank #376 #372
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 7.3 8.9
Attempts 66/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.5% 27.5%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 66 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.034
Total Cost $0.000 $0.016
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.080 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 37,449 146,361
Output Tokens 1,677 9,073
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 1
Response Time (avg) 38.01s 7.11s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 30.51s
Response Time (total) 798.15s 163.46s
Parameters ~21B total (~3B active) 120B total (12B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#376 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#372 Nemotron 3 Super

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
137.8s
Tokens
2,447 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Nemotron 3 Super 3.3 7.2 11.1% 1 2.64s 7,627 571 0

Switch Comparison Pair