Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.017. Nemotron 3 Super is faster at 5.97s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelNemotron 3 SuperIt has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 6.7x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super none Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available
Score 4.7 4.9
Rank #180 #169
Reliability 10.0 8.5
Consistency 7.2 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 30.3%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.034
Total Cost $0.000 $0.017
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.210 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.455 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 63,519
Output Tokens 1,677 6,434
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 5.97s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 20.00s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 131.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#180 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#169 Nemotron 3 Super

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
137.8s
Tokens
2,447 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Nemotron 3 Super 3.3 7.2 11.1% 1 2.64s 7,627 571 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair