Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.9. Nemotron 3 Super has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.091. Nemotron 3 Super is faster at 5.97s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelNemotron 3 SuperIts score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 5.0), while costing about 11.4x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super none Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.9 5.0
Rank #186 #181
Reliability 8.5 9.9
Consistency 8.8 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 25.8%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.034 3.022
Total Cost $0.008 $0.091
Input Price $0.080 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.450 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 63,519 118,746
Output Tokens 6,434 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 383,885
Response Time (avg) 5.97s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 20.00s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 131.31s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#186 Nemotron 3 Super

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
137.8s
Tokens
2,447 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Super 3.3 7.2 11.1% 1 2.64s 7,627 571 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair