Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.091. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIts score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 5.0), while costing about 57.0x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.9 5.0
Rank #187 #181
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.3 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 25.8%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 3.022
Total Cost $0.002 $0.091
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 118,746
Output Tokens 14,903 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 383,885
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair