Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.8. GPT-5.4 Nano has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.091. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 85.35s, with pass rates of 28.8% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.4 NanoIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 5.0), while costing about 2.2x less than Laguna S 2.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.8 5.0
Rank #189 #181
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.2 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 28.8% 25.8%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.011 3.022
Total Cost $0.041 $0.091
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 115,924 118,746
Output Tokens 13,794 67,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 383,885
Response Time (avg) 2.57s 85.35s
Response Time (max) 25.50s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 56.51s 1877.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#189 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

#181 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair