Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3 Coder Next (medium)

GPT-5.4 Nano leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.7. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.034 vs $0.041. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 9.61s, with pass rates of 28.8% vs 27.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#201
Total Output Tokens
13,794
Response Time (avg)
2.57s
Total Cost
$0.041
Rank
#209
Total Output Tokens
19,069
Response Time (avg)
9.61s
Total Cost
$0.034
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano

It has the best score here (4.8), while responding about 3.7x faster than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.8 4.7
Rank #201 #209
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 28.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.011 0.793
Total Cost $0.041 $0.034
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Output Price $1.250 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 115,924 148,194
Output Tokens 13,794 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.57s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 25.50s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 56.51s 153.69s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#201 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

#209 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair