Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.5. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.032. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) is faster at 9.61s vs 11.67s, with pass rates of 15.2% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder Next (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.5 4.7
Rank #200 #196
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 15.2% 27.3%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.205 0.793
Total Cost $0.025 $0.032
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,598 148,194
Output Tokens 57,634 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 11.67s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 200.52s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 256.80s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#196 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair