Navigate
Advertise here

Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 4.7 vs 4.7. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.071. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) is faster at 16.97s vs 17.65s, with pass rates of 14.5% vs 24.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#370
Total Output Tokens
99,097
Response Time (avg)
17.65s
Total Cost
$0.044
Rank
#372
Total Output Tokens
40,395
Response Time (avg)
16.97s
Total Cost
$0.071
Recommended model Laguna S 2.1

It has the best score here (4.7), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 4.7 4.7
Rank #370 #372
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 14.5% 24.6%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 2.306 2.280
Total Cost $0.044 $0.071
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Output Price $0.180 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.009 / 1M $0.070 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 287,445 311,647
Output Tokens 99,097 40,395
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 17.65s 16.97s
Response Time (max) 200.52s 151.35s
Response Time (total) 406.05s 305.55s
Parameters 118B total (8B active) 80B total (3B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#370 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#372 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Granite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableNorth Mini CodedefaultFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumDeepSeek V3.2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewdefaultvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableNorth Mini CodedefaultFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMercury 2.5 PreviewdefaultvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1noneFree Available