- Rank
- #315
- Total Output Tokens
- 766,130
- Response Time (avg)
- 81.93s
- Total Cost
- $0.129
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium) vs Laguna S 2.1
The average score is effectively tied at 4.7 vs 4.7. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.129. Laguna S 2.1 is faster at 17.65s vs 81.93s, with pass rates of 47.8% vs 14.5%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #317
- Total Output Tokens
- 99,097
- Response Time (avg)
- 17.65s
- Total Cost
- $0.047
Recommended model
Laguna S 2.1
It has the best score here (4.7), while costing about 2.8x less than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium Free Available | Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Rank | #315 | #317 |
| Reliability | 9.8 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 5.8 | 8.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 47.8% | 14.5% |
| Flaky tests | 12 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 2.306 |
| Total Cost | $0.129 | $0.047 |
| Input Price | $0.060 / 1M | $0.090 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.160 / 1M | $0.180 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 195,780 | 287,445 |
| Output Tokens | 167,746 | 99,097 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 598,384 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 81.93s | 17.65s |
| Response Time (max) | 437.11s | 200.52s |
| Response Time (total) | 1884.31s | 406.05s |
| Parameters | 30B total (3B active) | 118B total (8B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Weights available |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#315 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 130.5s
- Tokens
- 6,750 tok
#317 Laguna S 2.1
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 7.6s
- Tokens
- 1,345 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 341.79s | 69,450 | 2,044 | 3,645 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 5.4 | 9.6 | 0.0% | 0 | 149.34s | 161,841 | 41,463 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 6.9 | 7.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.34s | 696 | 6,904 | 20,862 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.1 | 7.9 | 8.3% | 1 | 835ms | 672 | 877 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 4.4 | 5.1 | 33.3% | 2 | 285.47s | 7,623 | 78,065 | 297,359 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.4 | 9.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 550ms | 7,917 | 424 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 136.91s | 98,571 | 15,769 | 112,376 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 21.62s | 99,668 | 10,893 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 23.24s | 7,944 | 4,195 | 30,097 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 537ms | 7,689 | 237 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 74.73s | 798 | 54,657 | 91,174 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 337ms | 771 | 18 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.36s | 516 | 3,127 | 3,157 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 815ms | 513 | 166 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 8.5 | 6.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 3.75s | 723 | 531 | 4,404 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 4.3 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 566ms | 702 | 54 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 4.2 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 10.49s | 726 | 1,170 | 18,195 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 828ms | 699 | 307 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.92s | 8,526 | 154 | 2,518 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.45s | 6,745 | 259 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 44.02s | 207 | 1,130 | 14,597 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 200.52s | 228 | 44,399 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Granite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneDeepSeek V3.2nonevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsGPT-5.4 NanononeNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsHy4 previewnoneNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9Bnone