Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

DeepSeek V3.2 leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.054. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 18.25s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIts score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 5.0), while costing about 33.5x less than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21
Score 5.0 4.9
Rank #182 #187
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 30.3%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 0.024
Total Cost $0.054 $0.002
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.010 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 114,375
Output Tokens 42,097 14,903
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 10.68s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 36.03s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 213.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#182 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair