Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano

Ling-2.6-flash leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.041. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 28.8%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.4 NanoIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 4.9), while responding about 4.2x faster than Ling-2.6-flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17
Score 4.9 4.8
Rank #187 #189
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 28.8%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 1.011
Total Cost $0.002 $0.041
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 115,924
Output Tokens 14,903 13,794
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 2.57s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 25.50s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 56.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#189 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair