Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super

The average score is effectively tied at 4.9 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.008. Nemotron 3 Super is faster at 5.97s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIt has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 5.0x less than Nemotron 3 Super.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super none Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available
Score 4.9 4.9
Rank #187 #186
Reliability 10.0 8.5
Consistency 9.3 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 0.034
Total Cost $0.002 $0.008
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.080 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 63,519
Output Tokens 14,903 6,434
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 5.97s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 20.00s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 131.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#186 Nemotron 3 Super

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
137.8s
Tokens
2,447 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
Nemotron 3 Super 3.3 7.2 11.1% 1 2.64s 7,627 571 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair