- Rank
- #329
- Total Output Tokens
- 14,903
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.21s
- Total Cost
- $0.002
Ling 2.6 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next (medium)
Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.5. Ling 2.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.069. Ling 2.6 Flash is faster at 10.21s vs 16.97s, with pass rates of 29.0% vs 24.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #319
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,395
- Response Time (avg)
- 16.97s
- Total Cost
- $0.069
Recommended model
Ling 2.6 Flash
Its score stays close to the best score here (4.5 vs 4.7), while costing about 49.3x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash none | Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Rank | #329 | #319 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 29.0% | 24.6% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.024 | 2.280 |
| Total Cost | $0.002 | $0.069 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.120 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.800 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 114,384 | 311,647 |
| Output Tokens | 14,903 | 40,395 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 10.21s | 16.97s |
| Response Time (max) | 36.03s | 151.35s |
| Response Time (total) | 214.31s | 305.55s |
| Parameters | 104B total (7.4B active) | 80B total (3B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#329 Ling 2.6 Flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#319 Qwen3 Coder Next
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 151.35s | 163,444 | 21,326 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.5 | 8.1 | 16.7% | 1 | 8.64s | 645 | 1,252 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.7 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 924ms | 7,185 | 336 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 14.65s | 121,413 | 16,067 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 81.80s | 7,758 | 246 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 570ms | 762 | 25 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.3 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.39s | 498 | 142 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 7.49s | 684 | 63 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.25s | 678 | 671 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.64s | 8,364 | 255 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 399ms | 216 | 12 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Granite 4.2 8BhighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumDeepSeek V3.2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing 2.6 FlashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsLing 2.6 Flashnone