Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super

The average score is effectively tied at 4.8 vs 4.9. Nemotron 3 Super has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.026. Nemotron 3 Super is faster at 5.97s vs 55.10s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelNemotron 3 SuperIt has the best score here (4.9), while costing about 3.2x less than Ring-2.6-1T.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-05-10 Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super none Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available
Score 4.8 4.9
Rank #194 #192
Reliability 10.0 8.5
Consistency 9.3 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.034
Total Cost $0.026 $0.008
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.085 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 7,599 63,519
Output Tokens 39,954 6,434
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 55.10s 5.97s
Response Time (max) 143.82s 20.00s
Response Time (total) 881.55s 131.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#194 Ring-2.6-1T

none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#192 Nemotron 3 Super

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
137.8s
Tokens
2,447 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 5,036 0
Nemotron 3 Super 3.3 7.2 11.1% 1 2.64s 7,627 571 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair