Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ring-2.6-1T vs GPT-5.4 Nano

The average score is effectively tied at 4.8 vs 4.8. Ring-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.041. GPT-5.4 Nano is faster at 2.57s vs 55.10s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 28.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#200
Total Output Tokens
39,954
Response Time (avg)
55.10s
Total Cost
$0.026
Rank
#201
Total Output Tokens
13,794
Response Time (avg)
2.57s
Total Cost
$0.041
Recommended model GPT-5.4 Nano

It has the best score here (4.8), while responding about 21.5x faster than Ring-2.6-1T.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-05-10 GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano none Release: 2026-03-17
Score 4.8 4.8
Rank #200 #201
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 28.8%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.011
Total Cost $0.026 $0.041
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 7,599 115,924
Output Tokens 39,954 13,794
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 55.10s 2.57s
Response Time (max) 143.82s 25.50s
Response Time (total) 881.55s 56.51s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#200 Ring-2.6-1T

none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#201 GPT-5.4 Nano

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
46.1s
Tokens
5,735 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 5,036 0
GPT-5.4 Nano 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,305 613 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair